The Christ in Prophecy Journal

Wilders Prophetic Warning – to Jews

Geert Wilders

A previously article, Fitna, addressed a short video produced by Geert Wilders, a Dutch lawmaker from the Netherlands. The 17-minute video he made addresses the rapid Islamization of Europe. The video uses only quotes from the Koran and Muslim teachers, news stories and scenes from Islamic events as proof that Europe is quickly becoming Eurasia.

Mr. Wilders, a modern-day Paul Revere, has been allowed to call out his warnings of the impending Islamic takeover in Israel and the United States. But, in his own European Union, Wilders’ cry goes ignored by its leaders and raged at by liberal and Islamic groups. He’s even been denied entry into Great Britain, following the lead of Indonesia. His own Dutch government first attempted to prosecute Mr. Wilders under Dutch anti-hate speech laws in June 2008, but failed. Again on January 21, 2009, his own court system ordered prosecutors to try him for hate speech, which if convicted, will land Wilders 16 months in jail and a fine of around $12,800. Court costs alone could eliminate his People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy, which is most likely the intended tactic of silencing Wilders and eliminating his party’s influence.

If there’s any proof that the Netherlands have already been taken over by Islam, the silencing of a warning by one of their own parliamentarians is proof that the battle has truly been lost in much of Europe.

Wilder’s Speech

Mr. Wilders’ came to the United States at the Hudson Institute in New York on September 25, 2008 to raise the alarm. While not a speech about Bible prophecy, Wilders’ discourse brings to light many prophetic end-time events that students of Bible prophecy will easily recognize.

Much of his speech will be analyzed and compared against Bible prophecy over the next few entries. For the full speech text, visit the People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy website.

Part 1 begins:

“I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The danger I see looming is the scenario of America as the last man standing. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe. In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe? Patriots from around Europe risk their lives every day to prevent precisely this scenario from becoming a reality.

My short lecture consists of 4 parts.

First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. Thirdly, if you are still here, I will talk a little bit about the movie you just saw. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.

The Europe you know is changing. You have probably seen the landmarks. The Eiffel Tower and Trafalgar Square and Rome’s ancient buildings and maybe the canals of Amsterdam. They are still there. And they still look very much the same as they did a hundred years ago.

But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world, a world very few visitors see — and one that does not appear in your tourist guidebook. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration. All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighbourhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corner. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighbourhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighbourhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities. In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims. Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear “whore, whore”. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin. In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can in many cases no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity. In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighbourhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan. Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.

Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favour of a worldwide caliphate. A Dutch study reported that half of Dutch Muslims admit they “understand” the 9/11 attacks.

Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’. And this is how we give them respect. Our elites are willing to give in. To give up. In my own country we have gone from calls by one cabinet member to turn Muslim holidays into official state holidays, to statements by another cabinet member, that Islam is part of Dutch culture, to an affirmation by the Christian-Democratic attorney general that he is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behaviour, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. Some prefer to see these as isolated incidents, but I call it a Muslim intifada. I call the perpetrators “settlers”. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies, they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighbourhoods, their cities, their countries.

Politicians shy away from taking a stand against this creeping sharia. They believe in the equality of all cultures. Moreover, on a mundane level, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.”

Prophetic Gleanings

One statement in Mr. Wilder’s speech that particularly strikes a prophetic chord is: “Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel.

“What Satan and man mean for evil — the persecution of the Jew — God uses to fulfill His purposes. Deuteronomy 30:1-9 and other verses tell of a time past when the Jews will be dispersed among the nations, but foretell that when the curses are over for the Jewish people God will gather them back into the land He promised them. Once regathered, the “time of trouble for Jacob” (Jer. 30:7) will end with the remaining Jews returned to God, accepting His Son Yeshua as Messiah.

Deuteronomy 30:1-9 sums up the redemption of the Jewish people as a race. It reads:

“1When all these blessings and curses I have set before you come upon you and you take them to heart wherever the LORD your God disperses you among the nations, 2 and when you and your children return to the LORD your God and obey him with all your heart and with all your soul according to everything I command you today, 3 then the LORD your God will restore your fortunes and have compassion on you and gather you again from all the nations where he scattered you. 4 Even if you have been banished to the most distant land under the heavens, from there the LORD your God will gather you and bring you back. 5 He will bring you to the land that belonged to your fathers, and you will take possession of it. He will make you more prosperous and numerous than your fathers. 6 The LORD your God will circumcise your hearts and the hearts of your descendants, so that you may love him with all your heart and with all your soul, and live. 7 The LORD your God will put all these curses on your enemies who hate and persecute you. 8 You will again obey the LORD and follow all his commands I am giving you today. 9 Then the LORD your God will make you most prosperous in all the work of your hands and in the fruit of your womb, the young of your livestock and the crops of your land. The LORD will again delight in you and make you prosperous, just as he delighted in your fathers.”

Mr. Wilders reports that Europe is turning on the Jew with a new wave of anti-Semitism. Like Russia before it, Europe is being shaken like a tree, resulting in Jews forcefully being uprooted from foreign land and being replanted back into the promised land. God’s shaking that tree, and we today are the ones witnessing Bible prophecy being fulfilled.

The next part of God’s promise — God returning blessing to the believing Jewish remnant — is merely a heartbeat away!

The next part covers Mr. Wilders’ warning to Islam.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


ABOUT AUTHOR View all posts Author Website

Dr. Nathan E. Jones

As the Internet Evangelist at Lamb & Lion Ministries, Nathan reaches out to the over 4.5 billion people accessible over the Internet with the Good News of Jesus Christ. He also co-hosts the ministry's television program Christ in Prophecy and podcast The Truth Will Set You Free.

14 CommentsLeave a Comment


    Banned politician Geert Wilders brands Gordon Brown a coward
    Rightwing Dutch politician Geert Wilders branded Prime Minister Gordon Brown the “biggest coward in Europe” after being refused entry to Britain to show his anti-Islam film.

    Last Updated: 2:00PM GMT 13 Feb 2009

    Mr Wilders described Prime Minister Gordon Brown as the “biggest coward in Europe” Photo: PA
    Wilders, who is facing prosecution in Holland for inciting hatred against Muslims, was detained on landing at Heathrow airport and sent back to the Netherlands just over three hours later.

    He had been invited by a British peer to show his film Fitna, which criticises the Koran as a “fascist book”, in the House of Lords.

    But no MPs and only five peers went to see the controversial film last night.

    The first screening, in the House of Lords, was attended by about 30 people.

    Organisers blamed poor attendance on the fact Parliament rose for a week’s recess earlier in the afternoon.

    There was a second screening later in the evening, for the Press, including journalists from the Netherlands, which Mr Wilders had been planning to attend.

    On Tuesday he received a letter from the Home Office saying he was unwelcome because his opinions “would threaten community security and therefore public security” in the UK.

    Mr Wilders, 45, a member of Holland’s Freedom Party, vowed to defy the ban and make the trip anyway.

    Speaking from the airport while he waited to be removed, Mr Wilders described Prime Minister Gordon Brown as the “biggest coward in Europe” and said Britain’s freedom of speech had been “set back centuries”.

    “We should have a public debate, we should have freedom of speech. It’s very easy to invite people who agree with you.

    “I think that a discussion is always better than barring people or turning people away,” he said.

    His 17-minute production quotes five Suras, or verses, from the Koran which he claims support violence against non-Muslims.

    The words are set alongside footage of notorious Islamist atrocities of recent years.

    They include the hijacked airliners slamming into the World Trade Centre in New York in 2001 and the London transport bombings in 2005.

    Also featured are clips of British Muslims preaching jihad, a pre-school age girl quoting Allah in support of anti-Semitism and Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claiming Islam’s goal is global revolution.

    The second part of the film draws attention to the growing population of Muslims in the Netherlands in particular, and Europe in general, over the past decade.

    It presents images of Muslim children’s faces covered with blood and the execution of homosexuals, suggesting this could be a vision of the Netherlands of the future.

    It closes with a call for Muslims to excise those passages from the Koran which, it claims, condone the use of force against non-believers and compares Islamist ideology to Nazism and Communism.

    Crossbench peer Baroness Cox, hosting the screening for the Press near to the Houses of Parliament, said she did not agree with everything the film suggested, but insisted Mr Wilders had a right to defend it.

    “I don’t think he’s got his judgment right,” she told reporters.

    “I can see his basic argument but I think it’s the wrong judgment.

    “What we’ve seen in this film, all the acts of violence, are for real, they’re not fabricated.

    “We have had in this country 7/7, we have had the Glasgow bombers and a small section of the Muslim community are being taught and trained to think and act in these terms.

    “That is a matter of serious concern and needs serious discussion.

    “I don’t agree with everything that Geert Wilders says, I don’t agree with the conclusions of his film, but he has a right to be here. He should be here answering these questions.”

    Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, backed the Government’s decision to keep Mr Wilders out of Britain, accusing Mr Wilders of inciting religious hatred.

    “Mr Wilders film is all about demonising and attacking Islam and Muslims,” he said, insisting his “hatred” for Islam was “based on fiction”.

    Mr Shafiq went on: “We in the UK value freedom and also our communities have worked so hard to build understanding and respect for each other, Mr Wilders and his fascist views are not welcomed to our country where we pride ourselves as a multi-faith society.

    “This is not about freedom of speech but about stopping the incitement to religious hatred this man promotes.”

    Britain bars entry by anti-Islamic Dutch lawmaker
    By RAPHAEL G. SATTER,Associated Press Writer AP – Friday, February 13LONDON – British officials barred a far-right Dutch lawmaker from entering the country when he flew in Thursday, citing his anti-Islamic views in an order that has touched off a wide-ranging debate in the United Kingdom about the limits of free speech.

    The British government had said Geert Wilders was not welcome because he posed a threat to “community harmony and therefore public security.”

    A letter from the British Embassy in the Netherlands this week informed Wilders that he would not be allowed into the United Kingdom, but he criticized the travel ban as an attempt to stifle freedom of speech and traveled to London anyway.

    Wilders told The Associated Press he had no regrets about the trip, attacking what he called “the cowards in the U.K. government” and accusing British Prime Minister Gordon Brown of having a servile attitude toward Islam.

    Wilders told the AP by telephone that it was “a sad day for Britain and freedom of speech.”

    “You would expect something like this to happen in Zimbabwe or Jordan,” he said.

    After returning to the Netherlands, Wilders said: “I expect that (Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter) Balkenende will firmly confront Brown about this.”

    British Foreign Secretary David Miliband told British Broadcasting Corp. that Wilders was guilty of “extreme anti-Muslim hate.”

    He said Britain supported freedom of expression, but “there is no freedom to cry ‘Fire’ in a crowded theater; there is no freedom to stir up racial and religious hatred.”

    After Wilders flew back to the Netherlands, the Dutch Embassy in London issued a statement saying it “deeply regrets that the British authorities” denied entry to a member of the Dutch parliament.

    “The Netherlands believes that a Dutch MP should be able to travel freely” in European Union members, the statement said.

    Wilders is being prosecuted in the Netherlands for on a hate speech charge after calling for a ban on Islam’s holy book, the Quran.

    He was invited to Britain by a member of Parliament’s upper house, the House of Lords, to show his 15-minute film “Fitna,” which juxtaposed verses from the Quran with images of violence by Muslim fanatics and calls on Muslims to “tear out the hateful verses from the Quran.”

    The film sparked violent protests around the Muslim world last year.

    Wilders has called the Quran a “fascist book” and urged that it be banned.

    Britain’s refusal to let Wilders into the country has sparked debate in Britain, with some commentators arguing that the ban had backfired.

    “Banning Geert Wilders insults Muslims, diminishes freedom and cheapens Britain,” Daniel Hannan, a Conservative lawmaker in the European Parliament, wrote on The Daily Telegraph’s Web site. “Being obnoxious is not a criminal offense.”

    Opinion in Britain’s 2 million-strong Muslim community runs strongly against Wilders. Manzoor Mughal, the chairman of the Muslim Forum, told BBC that Wilders was peddling hatred under the cloak of free speech.

    “His film is a scurrilous attack on Islam,” Mughal said. “His film propagates hatred and poisonous lies, and therefore it should be banned,”

    But the Quilliam Foundation, a British-based Muslim think tank devoted to fighting extremism, said Wilders should have been allowed into the country so that his views could be challenged “through debate and argument.”

    “Freedom of speech should be protected _ so long as people do not use this freedom to call for violence against others,” the foundation said in a statement.

    Britain has barred controversial public figures from Britain before, although the policy’s application has been uneven.

    The government was criticized for granting a work permit to controversial Jamaican reggae singer Rodney Pryce (better known as Bounty Killer), which allowed him to perform in Britain in November. Gay rights campaigners were outraged, saying the singer’s lyrics encouraged the murder of homosexuals.

    Hard-line Egyptian cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi was allowed into Britain in 2004 after being invited by the mayor of London to speak at a conference, but his visit was widely criticized. When he asked to come last year, reportedly for medical treatment, he was refused: The government said his views justify terrorism.
    Copyright © 2009 Yahoo!

  • What Islam can’t take by force, they take by trickery. They use our own multi-culturalism against us (the West), and we let them do it in the name of tolerance and understanding.

    To Islam, “tolerance” and “understanding” are as much a weapon as a road-side bomb or an AK-47.

  • the media in our country and abroad will continue to persecute anyone who speaks the truth about islam. i think its important to continue to quote the anti jew and anti christian rhetoric of muslims and the koran, side by side with what they categorize as hate speech by christians. this will turn some people around. i don’t think the average american understands that once “hate-speech” is determined to be against the law(as in anything anti-gay, anti-islam), it will start to infiltrate the pulpit. whats at stake is our fundamental right to preach what the bible says. if a preacher cannot publicly state what the bible says, for example, that homosexuality is an abomination. we are in big trouble as a nation.

  • this is actually starting already with talk radio, under the fairness doctrine that will silence many radio preachers if enacted. faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of god. statistics show that most adults listen to talk radio, not music. thousands of people are saved by radio preaching. I have been blessed abundantly by radio.

  • The rapture is not going to happen, all religion is mythology created because people do not want to admit they cease to exist after death, and religion is responsible for far more violence and death than secularism. If I am wrong, may your all-powerful god strike me dead and send an angel to tell you. (Okay, get your christian apologist arguments ready!)

    And the fairness doctrine is not going to silence preachers. We don’t want to silence you – you are far too entertaining. Sheesh. You folks are paranoid.

    That should get y’all riled up for a while!

  • i never read such a bullcrap,, wilders is a fascist,, he is just like hitler,, he only scares people for the zionist agenda, he is well known among the zionists.

  • I can see a day when churches will lose their tax-exemption unless they teach what the US government deems to be appropriate or “lawful.”

    Who defines what is or is not hate-speech? The people, the courts, the lawyers or the government?

    And, for what it’s worth, I can’t stand what passes for music anymore anyway. Thank God for talk radio.

  • And you know what else amazes me? It seems that everyone is entitled to their opinions except for Christians and Jews. Buddhists are all right, as are Muslims, athiests, humanists, and evolutionists.

    Weird, huh?

  • “San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now.”


    Fernando USA

  • Bad faith. Bad Faith. Bad faith. And persifflage. No I’m not Christian. No I’m not muslim. But I sense bad faith when I meet it. And there is a poll on which crown one will be given in heaven. And a little virgin with that? “Oh no! Not us!” Pathetic. Prophet of falsity. And you know it.

  • Well, let us face it, most people dp not like jews because through their dilligencetbey acquire a lot of power and influence, this freaks out many in the host "tribes" as history shows. So if fanatical islamists in europe scare ghe jews into moving to israel, europeans do not mind, of course that will make israel stronger but that is a moslem problem. Once most jews haveeft europe then all this post WW2 ethnic hipersensitivity will fly out the window and THEN europeans will ki k the moslems out. Mark my words.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *